New–Risk Assessment Validation Studies
Click here to view: Validation of the Caprini Risk Assessment Model in Otolaryngology Patients pdf.
Click here to view: Validation of the Caprini Risk Assessment Model in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Patients pdf.
Click here to view: A Validation Study of a Retrospective Venous Thromboembolism Risk Scoring Method pdf.
Click here to view: Increasing awareness about venous disease: The American Venous Forum expands the National Venous Screening Program pdf.
Click here to view: Results of the National Pilot Screening Program for Venous Disease by the American Venous Forum pdf.
Click here to view: Thrombosis Risk Assessment as a Guide to Quality Patient Care by Joseph A. Caprini, MD pdf.
Click here to view: Venous Thromboembolism Risk Factor Assessment pdf.
Click here to view: Thromboembolic Risk Assessment and the Efficacy of Enoxaparin Prophylaxis in Excisional Body Contouring Surgery pdf.
Click here to view: Thrombotic Risk Assessment: A Hybrid Approach pdf.
Click here to view: Risk factors for venous thrombosis in medical inpatients: validation of a thrombosis risk score pdf.
Click here to view: Efficacy and Safety of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Highest Risk Plastic Surgery Patients pdf.
Click here to view: Why Thrombosis Prophylaxis Fails pdf.
Since this article was written a number of new publications have appeared in medical, and orthopedic and non-orthopedic surgical groups and the references are included here1-10
1. Pannucci CJ, Obi A, Alvarez R, et al. Inadequate venous thromboembolism risk stratification predicts venous thromboembolic events in surgical intensive care unit patients. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:898-904.
2. Pannucci CJ, Dreszer G, Wachtman CF, et al. Postoperative enoxaparin prevents symptomatic venous thromboembolism in high-risk plastic surgery patients. Plastic and reconstructive surgery 2011;128:1093-103.
3. Zhou HX, Peng LQ, Yan Y, et al. Validation of the Caprini risk assessment model in Chinese hospitalized patients with venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 2012;130:735-40.
4. Saragas NP, Ferrao PN, Saragas E, Jacobson BF. The impact of risk assessment on the implementation of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons 2014;20:85-9.
5. Cassidy MR, Rosenkranz P, McAneny D. Reducing postoperative venous thromboembolism complications with a standardized risk-stratified prophylaxis protocol and mobilization program. J Am Coll Surg 2014;218:1095-104.
6. Mokhtari M, Attarian H, Norouzi M, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk assessment, prophylaxis practices and interventions for its improvement (AVAIL-ME Extension Project, Iran). Thromb Res 2014;133:567-73.
7. Jeong HS, Miller TJ, Davis K, et al. Application of the Caprini risk assessment model in evaluation of non-venous thromboembolism complications in plastic and reconstructive surgery patients. Aesthetic surgery journal / the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic surgery 2014;34:87-95.
8. Rhee SJ, Cantelmo NL, Conrad MF, Stoughton J. Factors influencing the incidence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovascular Surg 2013;47:207-12.
9. tudor R, Ştefan C, Adrian P, Sorin C, Anca D. PAI-1 4G:5G and MTHFR C677T polymorphisms increased the accuracy of two prediction scores for the risk of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Romanian Journal of Morphology & Embryology 2014; 55:153-7.
10. Zhou H, Wang L, Xiaoling W, et al. Validation of a venous thromboembolism risk assessment model in hospitalized chinese patients-A case controlled study. Journal of Athersclerosis and Thrombosis 2014;21:261-72.